Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dinah Bucholz's avatar

This article cuts through the noise and goes straight to the heart of the matter. This line particularly captures the thesis in a clever and poignant way:

"If in the past killing was the method by which peace was achieved, today peace is the method by which killing is achieved."

I also liked the play on words, "snatching defeat from the Jews of victory."

I wouldn't completely dismiss international pressure, especially U.S. pressure. I think that does impede Israel's ability to win because Israel relies (too much) on U.S. military aid. But I think two things can be true at once, and it's true that ripping off the bandaid quickly is what we needed to do from the beginning. I thought then and I still think now that if Israel had invaded Gaza after Oct. 7 and completely taken over, establishing military rule while uprooting Hamas, the war would have ended quickly and decisively with fewer deaths.

Patricia Gauthier's avatar

I don’t understand how you can win and forever have peace when you are a tiny country surrounded by enemies sworn to kill you wherever you are, wherever you go and you need the help of a powerful other country to help end this war. To “ make them not want to kill uou,” you must completely destroy them. Besides that you must destroy any people among them who might think as you do. It is hard enough to win when you are a big, powerful country since you have enemies everywhere and every choice you make has unforeseen consequences.

88 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?